GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-12 > 1228408016


From: "M Robards" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Question on how DYF399X is reported
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:26:56 -0800
References: <e9e628270812032108m3db49d66td98aae17dca4da39@mail.gmail.com><1794567109.1775511228394472072.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <1794567109.1775511228394472072.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>


Thank you, Didier and Kirsten, I understand now how the 'order' part
works :) I haven't uploaded either of them to ysearch yet. I'm going
to see what the third kit's result is, should be today or so (?) since
it was in the same batch as the one that came in yesterday.

Since it's already taken me 15 minutes to type this short post :) I
doubt I'll have time to get this on ysearch until later today. So cct
is not the norm? But ctt is. So maybe it's an I1c thing? I'll post
again when the third one is reported.

thnx again!

melissa

This thread: