GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-12 > 1229107671
From: "Dienekes Pontikos" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Why Western M269 can't be accurately aged
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:47:51 +0200
Thank you for "reminding" me, but it was not necessary, since I was
the one who used that prior in my post. The point that uniform(1,1000)
is inappropriate stands.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Vincent Vizachero
> gest is in generations, not years.
> 1500 years is 50 generations, more or less.
> On Dec 12, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Dienekes Pontikos wrote:
>> uniform(1,1000) is not really a valid prior for R-M269. We know
>> directly of its presence ~1,500 years ago, for example.
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Dienekes' Anthropology Blog: http://dienekes.blogspot.com
Γενετική των Ελλήνων: http://greekgenetics.blogspot.com/
Anthropological Research Page: http://dienekes.50webs.com/arp
|Re: [DNA] Why Western M269 can't be accurately aged by "Dienekes Pontikos" <>|