GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: Charles Hollenbeck <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] in 5 years
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:16:50 -0700
References: <00c101c9a33c$503007a0$6400a8c0@Ken1><175A11707AB943C2ACD3DBEE2C62D519@HP><79d120de0903121258n448e59bdy377367d4152ded4a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <79d120de0903121258n448e59bdy377367d4152ded4a@mail.gmail.com>

Not if they're smart. They'll always be thinking up ways to improve the
design.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM, adam bradford <>wrote:

> An interesting question. Will the cyborgs of the future conceive of
> themselves partially as the *end point* (my italics, CEH ) of a pedigree
> of design styles,
> laboratories, microchips, processors, biotech firms, inventors, etc.?
>

This thread:

• [DNA] in 5 years by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
  • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
    • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
      • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
    • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by adam bradford <>

      • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by Charles Hollenbeck <>

        • Re: [DNA] in 5 years by adam bradford <>