GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-03 > 1237053957


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Gender attraction and Genetics
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:05:57 -0600
References: <35663244470748B196F22CE70D5EAA78@DonPC><92E84C230A4746618A3FA50987957265@RichardNW><B9C34F0AB5934F38BF4F0B3FF2048345@DonPC><00a101c9a4ca$adb21cd0$6400a8c0@Ken1><F932B6AD850648E68E3F17936BFB17C7@DonPC>


Maybe it was your introductory message to this subject charging that "social
prejudices" and "religious dogma" and then "personal prejudices" were the
obstacles to something (not clear to me) you wanted the list to get into?
The usual nature- versus-nurture verbal war on the underlying causes of
homosexual preferences as well as research studies as well as political and
cultural warfare on the subject is out there for anyone to participate
in --- but let's keep it out of this list.







----- Original Message -----
From: "Don May" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Gender attraction and Genetics


> For having brought up the subject of the possibility of a genetic
> connection
> to gender attraction so far I have been accused of a "Homosexual Agenda"
> "A
> Crusade," and "Zealotry." And that I should go elsewhere. I will not judge
> this group as a whole on those responses.
>
>
>
> Am I being shouted down for asking questions. I was reminded by some good
> folks on this group that there are no stupid questions. Obviously some
> here
> think there are "socially unacceptable questions." J
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Gender attraction and Genetics
>
>
>> Please, take your crusade and zealotry to another site.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Don May" <>
>> To: <>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DNA] Gender attraction and Genetics
>>
>>
>>>I do not apologize for my post. Only the reference of "setting aside
>>> religious beliefs" which was a poor choice of words and not meant to
>>> imply
>>> one should give up their religion, only be open to scientific truth when
>>> confronted with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without
>> the
>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/2001 - Release Date: 03/14/09
> 06:54:00
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: