GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-04 > 1239231499
From: Jonathan Day <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] New advanced results, curious of significance.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Hmmmm. That does pose an interesting challenge. :) Thank you for pointing that out. So, until a lot more people get tested, there's very little more that I can learn, and short of winning the lottery and buying everyone in Ulster test kits, it looks set to remain that way for a while.
I appreciate you answering this, thanks.
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, John Chandler <> wrote:
> From: John Chandler <>
> Subject: Re: [DNA] New advanced results, curious of significance.
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 3:42 PM
> Jonathan wrote:
> > I'll summarize what I'm looking for as a list:
> I can summarize the answers to your questions with one
> fact. In all
> of Ysearch, there is only one other 67-marker haplotype
> that it almost
> sure to be related to yours within the past 700 years (the
> name is
> Clendenon). There simply isn't enough of a sample to
> learn anything
> by statistical analysis here.
> John Chandler
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the
> subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] New advanced results, curious of significance. by Jonathan Day <>|