GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-07 > 1246592270


From: "Tim Janzen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] R1b Origins (was OurEuropeangeographicalblock. . .)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:37:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: <005801c9fb4c$28eb5f10$6400a8c0@Ken1>


Dear Ken,
I haven't made any significant changes to my interclade program
since I sent you a copy of it on December 8. I included the weighting
factors just like you included in your Generations2 program. I think that
the only significant difference between our programs is that we use slightly
different markers as I summarized in this message:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GENEALOGY-DNA/2008-09/12225743
42. We use different mutation rates for markers 38-67 in the 67 marker
FTDNA panel.
Sincerely,
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 12:35 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] R1b Origins (was OurEuropeangeographicalblock. . .)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Janzen" <>

Tim, I don't know what your program does? Have you kept in the interclade
part the weighting factors w(i) which tend to downweight the fast markers,
and more so as G increases?

This thread: