GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-07 > 1248436473
From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Fw: For Age Estimates beware of tossing STRs away
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:54:33 -0400
References: <293787.49661.qm@web111412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><F6A712F0420D4636ABA01CFA36200635@RichardNW><6A22AC17-1B7D-4B34-9EEF-00BB6A32A783@bellsouth.net><EABA8D13-827B-40BC-A384-E5D744719ACE@vizachero.com><01F89A55-878C-4B0B-87E1-A52B45CEF547@bellsouth.net><9F280603-E3E6-4514-9699-8583DB091E55@vizachero.com><2B73FF420BBD42158EE8B08C1632DEBB@elizabethod>
In-Reply-To: <2B73FF420BBD42158EE8B08C1632DEBB@elizabethod>
I won't speak for anyone else, but I work under no such assumption.
Genetic dating is neither as precise nor as accurate as radiocarbon
dating, and probably never will be.
VV
On Jul 24, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Elizabeth O'Donoghue wrote:
> I agree with your comments, as well as Lynn's, but my hesitation is
> that you
> speak with the assumption that you and those of you who agree, that
> the
> rates and calculations you are using are as foolproof and certain as
> radiocarbon dating and the like.
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Fw: For Age Estimates beware of tossing STRs away by Vincent Vizachero <> |