GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-08 > 1249605871
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Did Dinaric I2a2 MRCA ancestors move southeastratherthannorthwest?
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:44:31 -0600
If it were just Disles versus Dinaric, it would be more difficult to
speculate who had the wandering ancestors and who stayed more put? But the
three clades of the ancestry of Dinaric found in northwest Europe starts
maybe to paint a picture.
Anyway, TN5BU seems on the Disles side of the division, though an
interesting outlier. Too bad we lost our snp which might have separated
Disles from Dinaric. I'd recommend DYS635, DYS461, and DYS441 which also
separate Disles from Dinaric.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Mayka" <>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Did Dinaric I2a2 MRCA ancestors move southeast
> If the key to locating the source of I2a2-Dinaric is I2a2-Disles, is there
> particular significance to Ysearch TN5BU of Germany? Is he roughly
> between Dinaric and Disles?
>> [mailto:] On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
>> Closest cousin is I2a2-Disles which at the moment is not
>> separated from I2a2-Disles by a snp. Disles clade is found
>> primarily in the British Isles. The node where branches to
>> Disles and to Dinaric part ways looks to be at least 5000 years ago.
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] Did Dinaric I2a2 MRCA ancestors move southeastratherthannorthwest? by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>|