GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-08 > 1251045432


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] validity
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:37:12 -0400
References: <e2f96c1b0908200505y2a063acdid4ce0575ebbee0f3@mail.gmail.com><REME20090820215525@alum.mit.edu><e2f96c1b0908201907p1ef31650j221cafe87d86ac0f@mail.gmail.com><E472E94BECBC4CAEA6011246F98E9782@BAZCHAP><59b150b0908212208r1376ebb0hc229eba544733b72@mail.gmail.com><CB32B1437952470CB3077D1EC3A266B0@HP><9F5A9735-EEEA-4EE7-A5DD-26DD1677823A@vizachero.com><6882E352D18F412C8508CBCA4DA4C992@HP><09DE0C9E-58F1-4DD8-8939-2F87B389DF9A@vizachero.com><BEB39975B6D0446EA8D6FC877E76C1F4@HP><89F17DEC-F8DC-4C8C-A8E9-5908FC90665A@vizachero.com><E86B34BB3829467393A5108D57A65A94@HP>
In-Reply-To: <E86B34BB3829467393A5108D57A65A94@HP>


My main fear is that there are people reading along who think your
position has any scientific basis. Perhaps I should have more faith
in them and drop the matter, since you show no inclination to be
reasonable?

VV

Sent from my iPod

On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:38 AM, "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <
> wrote:

> No, I don't, and you're the one who can't accept that I don't.


This thread: