GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-08 > 1251317601


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: [DNA] HIJK/G or GIJK/H or IJK/GH or G/H/IJK
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:13:21 -0600
References: <B1A709A36B7B4EE892FB49A27FC6C914@PC><88998228-BDD8-403E-A864-50CB7E48CD8D@vizachero.com>


There's a type of F which most notably has 17-17 at DYS464. Does anyone
know its name or most downstream known snp? It seems to be the type of F
which populates Europe most "strongly" (but really not very strongly).

Ken


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Vizachero" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] HIJK/G or GIJK/H or IJK/GH


> There are two SNPs that define IJK. All the people in G and H that
> were tested for these two SNPs were ancestral (aka "negative").
>
> There would be some value in knowing if F1, F2, F3, or F4 (or F*,
> too) have tested these two SNPs and that's something I don't know.
> The last time we discussed it on this list F4 was not checked for the
> IJK SNPs, but that was almost a year ago.
>
> VV
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Lancaster-Boon wrote:
>
>> I am wondering if all the people doing 23andMe, WTY and so on have
>> yet been
>> able to solve the question of HIJK/G or GIJK/H or IJK/GH?
>>
>> K includes lots of clades, so I imagine the bottleneck has been
>> getting
>> enough H data?
>>
>> Regards
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>>
>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and
>> the body of the message
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: