GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-08 > 1251328812


From: Charles Hollenbeck <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] HIJK/G or GIJK/H or IJK/GH
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:20:12 -0700
References: <B1A709A36B7B4EE892FB49A27FC6C914@PC><88998228-BDD8-403E-A864-50CB7E48CD8D@vizachero.com>
In-Reply-To: <88998228-BDD8-403E-A864-50CB7E48CD8D@vizachero.com>


On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Vincent Vizachero
<>wrote:

> There are two SNPs that define IJK...


Four. L15, L16, ISOGG's L69.1, and rs2049642 (27108406, A->G) on 23andMe.


> All the people in G and H that
> were tested for these two SNPs were ancestral (aka "negative").
>
> There would be some value in knowing if F1, F2, F3, or F4 (or F*,
> too) have tested these two SNPs and that's something I don't know.
> The last time we discussed it on this list F4 was not checked for the
> IJK SNPs, but that was almost a year ago.
>
> VV
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Lancaster-Boon wrote:
>
> > I am wondering if all the people doing 23andMe, WTY and so on have
> > yet been
> > able to solve the question of HIJK/G or GIJK/H or IJK/GH?
> >
> > K includes lots of clades, so I imagine the bottleneck has been
> > getting
> > enough H data?
> >
> > Regards
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>
> > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and
> > the body of the message
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: