GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265037776
From: "Sandy Paterson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:22:56 -0000
I worked with 67 markers.
Not sure where you see a distance of 4 in one generation though.
[mailto:] On Behalf Of John Lerch
Sent: 01 February 2010 14:02
To: genealogy-dna: rootsweb.com
Subject: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA
You forgot to mention how many markers you were looking at. E.G. A distance
of 4 in 1 generation for a 12 marker profile is absurd.
Sandy P wrote
Much work has been done on the estimation of TMRCA's between pairs of
haplotypes but I've not come across anything that addresses the question of
analysing genetic distances for given TMRCA's. That could simply be because
I don't read very widely.
Whatever the reason, for my own interest, as well as hopefully for the
interest of anyone interested in deep genealogy, I've had a look at this.
The idea is to address for example the following question : If two families
are believed by traditional genealogy to have had a common ancestor say 30
generations ago, what genetic distance would one expect today between
members of the two different families?
The following table gives a partial answer to that question.
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA by "Sandy Paterson" <>|