GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265042931


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:48:51 -0500
References: <20100201090210.PF9A3.561848.root@mp17>
In-Reply-To: <20100201090210.PF9A3.561848.root@mp17>


I don't think it's ever necessary to call anyone's message "absurd," especially
when it's pretty obvious they cannot have been working with just 12 markers.
Perhaps the thing to do in this kind of situation is politely ask them to
clarify what they meant.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of John Lerch
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:02 AM
> To: genealogy-dna: rootsweb.com
> Subject: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA
>
> You forgot to mention how many markers you were looking at.
> E.G. A distance of 4 in 1 generation for a 12 marker profile
> is absurd.
>


This thread: