GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265043628


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] re GD vs TMRCA
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:04:11 -0500
References: <20100201090210.PF9A3.561848.root@mp17><921C9B4B-4C4C-48BB-B100-F5D768B4F131@vizachero.com><000001caa35f$4ac7d030$e0577090$@com>
In-Reply-To: <000001caa35f$4ac7d030$e0577090$@com>


Yes, that's the way to read it.

VV


On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Sandy Paterson wrote:

> Am I correct in my understanding that the table suggests that for a
> TMRCA of
> 12, there is about a 70% probability that the gd is 5 or less?


This thread: