GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265731968


From: Janet Crawford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:12:48 +0000
References: <809631690.1414571265719065460.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><2037247902.1419161265720034807.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><ea3bd9561002090725o24f89bf5n5f6d3fdaa2a66bf0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea3bd9561002090725o24f89bf5n5f6d3fdaa2a66bf0@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Faux <> wrote:
> Anatole,
>
> Judging by the phletora of "unpositive" comments from people who are well
> versed in the statistical nuances of what you are asserting, you are under
> attack from all quarters. Etc., Etc., Etc.

David, Since I joined this list I have seen that Anatole is always
ready and willing to put out his formulas, show his math, and explain
everything.
I have only seen verbal attacks from you. Put up or hush up. In
detail, prove what Anatole states is wrong and explain why.

Janet


This thread: