GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265733154


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:32:34 -0500
References: <809631690.1414571265719065460.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><2037247902.1419161265720034807.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><ea3bd9561002090725o24f89bf5n5f6d3fdaa2a66bf0@mail.gmail.com><35bbfc2c1002090812u217291c4g827827b729b3a48@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <35bbfc2c1002090812u217291c4g827827b729b3a48@mail.gmail.com>


Janet,

Let's leave aside the personalities involved: it seems that only
Anatole thinks that his own approach holds any merit.

No one is ever under obligation to accept criticism constructively, of
course, but be fair to David. Although the whole tangent that Anatole
started is off topic, it was obviously meant to provoke so why act
surprised that it did provoke?

VV


On Feb 9, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Janet Crawford wrote:

> David, Since I joined this list I have seen that Anatole is always
> ready and willing to put out his formulas, show his math, and explain
> everything.
> I have only seen verbal attacks from you. Put up or hush up. In
> detail, prove what Anatole states is wrong and explain why.


This thread: