GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265733343
From: David Faux <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:35:43 -0800
Did you miss entirely the sole point I made here, relating to the respect
due those who are peer reviewers? Please read my posts more carefully.
David K. Faux.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Janet Crawford <> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Faux <> wrote:
> > Anatole,
> > Judging by the phletora of "unpositive" comments from people who are well
> > versed in the statistical nuances of what you are asserting, you are
> > attack from all quarters. Etc., Etc., Etc.
> David, Since I joined this list I have seen that Anatole is always
> ready and willing to put out his formulas, show his math, and explain
> I have only seen verbal attacks from you. Put up or hush up. In
> detail, prove what Anatole states is wrong and explain why.
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster by David Faux <>|