GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265733343


From: David Faux <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:35:43 -0800
References: <809631690.1414571265719065460.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><2037247902.1419161265720034807.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><ea3bd9561002090725o24f89bf5n5f6d3fdaa2a66bf0@mail.gmail.com><35bbfc2c1002090812u217291c4g827827b729b3a48@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <35bbfc2c1002090812u217291c4g827827b729b3a48@mail.gmail.com>


Janet,

Did you miss entirely the sole point I made here, relating to the respect
due those who are peer reviewers? Please read my posts more carefully.

David K. Faux.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Janet Crawford <> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Faux <> wrote:
> > Anatole,
> >
> > Judging by the phletora of "unpositive" comments from people who are well
> > versed in the statistical nuances of what you are asserting, you are
> under
> > attack from all quarters. Etc., Etc., Etc.
>
> David, Since I joined this list I have seen that Anatole is always
> ready and willing to put out his formulas, show his math, and explain
> everything.
> I have only seen verbal attacks from you. Put up or hush up. In
> detail, prove what Anatole states is wrong and explain why.
>
> Janet
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: