GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265734040
From: Janet Crawford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:47:20 +0000
Strawman, David. As I said, prove exactly where Anatole is wrong and
why. Use formulas and math.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:35 PM, David Faux <> wrote:
> Did you miss entirely the sole point I made here, relating to the respect
> due those who are peer reviewers? Please read my posts more carefully.
> David K. Faux.
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Janet Crawford <> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Faux <> wrote:
>> > Anatole,
>> > Judging by the phletora of "unpositive" comments from people who are well
>> > versed in the statistical nuances of what you are asserting, you are
>> > attack from all quarters. Etc., Etc., Etc.
>> David, Since I joined this list I have seen that Anatole is always
>> ready and willing to put out his formulas, show his math, and explain
>> I have only seen verbal attacks from you. Put up or hush up. In
>> detail, prove what Anatole states is wrong and explain why.
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster by Janet Crawford <>|