GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1265734653


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Variance Assessment of R:U106 DYS425Null Cluster
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:57:33 -0500
References: <809631690.1414571265719065460.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><2037247902.1419161265720034807.JavaMail.root@sz0002a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net><ea3bd9561002090725o24f89bf5n5f6d3fdaa2a66bf0@mail.gmail.com><35bbfc2c1002090812u217291c4g827827b729b3a48@mail.gmail.com><5F0DF600-3192-4CB2-9760-F9749B08D08C@vizachero.com><35bbfc2c1002090848p3474c35bmc2235d9111f5c939@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <35bbfc2c1002090848p3474c35bmc2235d9111f5c939@mail.gmail.com>


It's been done over and over already.

But as a general rule, it is quite easy to throw out crackpot theories
then stand by and wait for others to prove you wrong. It is also a
common rhetorical technique, and some of us have seen it enough that
we've tired of taking the bait.

VV


On Feb 9, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Janet Crawford wrote:

> As I said to David - prove it.


This thread: