GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266504674


From: Robert Tarín <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] King Tutankhamun's Y-DNA - Eureka!
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:51:14 -0600
References: <e2f96c1b1002172203x6c1d467leb4704e90da74bcc@mail.gmail.com><000c01cab08a$46984480$d3c8cd80$@org><4351D390-54FE-44EF-9281-2F14AA134DD1@vizachero.com><4B7D5028.7000505@san.rr.com> <001601cab0a8$65277740$2f7665c0$@org>
In-Reply-To: <001601cab0a8$65277740$2f7665c0$@org>


In the one of the Discovery Channel's videos they show them extracting from
deep inside a femur. Not sure there would be much chance for contamination
there.

...from the study....

These results were repeatedly obtained
with DNA extracted from 2 to 4
different biopsies per mummy; moreover,
they differed from the Y profiles of
the male laboratory staff and were independently
reproduced twice in a second
laboratory physically isolated from
the first, data-generating laboratory.


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Lawrence Mayka <> wrote:

> The problem is that the haplotype is not just R1b, but clearly R1b1b2.
> Indeed, suspiciously so. Contamination?
>
> > From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> > ] On Behalf Of Al Aburto
> > R1b is found in North Africa isn't it? The frequency is just very low
> ....
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: