GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266516131


From: Al Aburto <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] King Tutankhamun's Y-DNA - Eureka!
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:02:11 -0800
References: <e2f96c1b1002172203x6c1d467leb4704e90da74bcc@mail.gmail.com> <000c01cab08a$46984480$d3c8cd80$@org> <4351D390-54FE-44EF-9281-2F14AA134DD1@vizachero.com>,<4B7D5028.7000505@san.rr.com> <001601cab0a8$65277740$2f7665c0$@org>,<SNT127-DS1868889B8CF5CC8B53A2278D470@phx.gbl><SNT115-W293600D81C9F5D26F6A1ADCC470@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <SNT115-W293600D81C9F5D26F6A1ADCC470@phx.gbl>


But how likely is that from drilled bone samples?

> On 2/18/2010 9:45 AM, Steven Bird wrote:
> Larry and Dan,
>
> I had also thought about the possibility of contamination from one of the British excavators many years ago having gotten into the samples extracted. That could conceivably affect both (or all) of the tested mummies.
>
>
> Steve
>
>


This thread: