GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266518293


From: Wilcox Lisa <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] King Tutankhamun's Y-DNA - Eureka!
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:38:13 -0800
References: <e2f96c1b1002172203x6c1d467leb4704e90da74bcc@mail.gmail.com><000c01cab08a$46984480$d3c8cd80$@org><4351D390-54FE-44EF-9281-2F14AA134DD1@vizachero.com><4B7D5028.7000505@san.rr.com><BB2D8776CE024C35AB42F2372F121CE6@elizabethod>,<6AEE8391-8061-46EE-B5F6-ED1BF433587F@vizachero.com>,<8262F8CAA3954C0491B3E08FE6783077@elizabethod><SNT115-W251F6957C670769E1278D4CC470@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <SNT115-W251F6957C670769E1278D4CC470@phx.gbl>


I know you all are having great fun with sleuthing and speculation,
but has anybody asked JAMA, "What were you thinking?!" Might they
respond to an email onslaught from listmembers? Would Dr. Hawass?

> I can't imagine why the JAMA referees allowed the publication of
> this article without the full evidence for paternity being presented
> at least online.


Lisa Wilcox


This thread: