GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266522463


From: Thomas Krahn <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Some more Tut DNA STR values from the video
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:56:10 -0600
References: <14735.6683cc3c.38ac6578@aol.com>, ,<SNT115-W45463D0E57A424FC088542CC480@phx.gbl>,<SNT115-W400377CF1A910C32AFA705CC480@phx.gbl> <SNT115-W209B414EEFCD31E04B9B32CC470@phx.gbl> <4B7D8D72.5060401@familytreedna.com><005a01cab0d1$6ba1cde0$42e569a0$@org>
In-Reply-To: <005a01cab0d1$6ba1cde0$42e569a0$@org>


Yes there are a few DYS393=9 even in different haplogroups, but there is
no-one that also matches the other markers.

Thomas

Lawrence Mayka wrote:
> By itself, DYS393 = 9 in an R-M269 is not unknown. The R1b-U152 has kit
> #E8003 with DYS393 = 9 and U152+.
>
>
>> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
>> ] On Behalf Of Thomas Krahn
>> Without the rare DYS393 allele 9 it matches multiple haplogroups. With
>> the DYS393 = 9 allele I have no matches in the FTDNA database.
>>



This thread: