GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266671035


From: "Richard Stevens" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] TMRCA of R1b1b2s to King Tut?
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:03:55 -0500
References: <mailman.5787.1266597968.2099.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com><7B3ED479CB324BD7925ACA7EB65A99C7@anatoldesktop><SNT131-ds20D5FD667AA954080F09D5BC450@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <SNT131-ds20D5FD667AA954080F09D5BC450@phx.gbl>


Wasn't that whole "King Tut might have been U152" thing based on the
mistaken idea that he had 393=9? Since it turns out Tut actually has 393=13,
U152 doesn't seem any more likely than any other variety of R1b1b2.

Rich



This thread: