GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266851053


From: "Lawrence Mayka" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS463 and DYS452
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:04:13 -0600
References: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPGEOBGPAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org><4B81D706.3060607@familytreedna.com><663D9BCEF1524D04936516981FC21BC6@HP><4B81F365.7090907@familytreedna.com><96935B881AD84A0D9B598E711FDF5650@HP><8239807.170330.1266835696891.JavaMail.www@wwinf2207> <DC5F2413E28F4D33B951436D2892B872@HP> <3B932EFD30B9489CA01D1BF9525B2EC2@HP><4B8290C9.1020905@san.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8290C9.1020905@san.rr.com>


M458 is the opposite situation. On the one hand, I would dearly like to
have M458 results shown clearly in project results via a subhaplogroup
designation. But on the other hand, I shudder the chilling effect on orders
when the current reasonable price as an Advanced SNP skyrockets to the Deep
Clade level.

The real problem, of course, is that R-M198 has been forced into the same
Deep Clade suite with R-M269.

> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> ] On Behalf Of Al Aburto
> I remember being told last year in June 2009 that a
> new SNP, L70, in our L25 clade would be added to the Deep Clade-J test
> in a few weeks! It has been long past a few weeks. For months I held
> off asking our members to order from "advanced orders" because "in a few
> weeks" (that never came) they would get a better price from the Deep
> Clade-J.



This thread: