GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1266969235


From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS463 and DYS452
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:53:55 -0600
References: <FEA8748CE75246AE9C735629D20F103C@HP><BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPEEPKGPAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org><5B7B9DC3797F4327AEDF556189B9AAA4@HP><002b01cab477$17ef7f40$47ce7dc0$@org><REME20100223141307@alum.mit.edu><308312211F7D454486D47A36DE3144E7@john><59b150b1002231549v33d94e74w134b8f54d3c59cc8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <59b150b1002231549v33d94e74w134b8f54d3c59cc8@mail.gmail.com>


That should have been about the same number, since those testing at FTDNA
would have the correct values. However, when I did a search, Ancestry seemed
to be the greatest source of the SMGF unique 9.

Bob

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Robert Stafford <>wrote:

> DY441 (+1). DYS442 (+5) and Y-GATA-A10 (+2) should have the same number of
> erroneous high values as DYS463. I appears that many people are not aware of
> the need for conversions.
>
> Bob Stafford.
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Alister John Marsh <>wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without
>> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>
>


This thread: