GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-02 > 1267277664


From: Margaret Jordan <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] L21 and U106 Deep Clade Results
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:34:24 +0000
References: <mailman.7312.1267245153.2099.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com><169E2F3FB6114E128B750C6706654050@anatoldesktop>
In-Reply-To: <169E2F3FB6114E128B750C6706654050@anatoldesktop>


Thanks to all for their help with my L21 and U106 query.

So, a Deep Clade test for R1b1b2 people is recommended, in order to
identify the correct subclade first and 67 markers are needed, as well,
to identify close matches within that subclade.

Regards,
Margaret


Anatole Klyosov wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I agree completely:
>
>
>
> R-P312:
>
>
>
> 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17
> 17 -- 11 11 19 23 15 15 18 17 36 38 12 12 -
>
> 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11
> 11 12 12
>
>
>
> L-21:
>
>
>
> 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17
> 17 -- 11 11 19 23 15 15 18 17 36 38 12 12 -
>
> 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11
> 11 12 12
>
>
>
> R-U152:
>
>
>
> 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17
> 17 -- 11 11 19 23 15 15 18 17 36 39 12 12 -
>
> 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11
> 11 12 12
>
>
>
> They are not only almost identical (it seems that there is only one
> deviation in "39" compared to "38", albeit it might be a fractional one),
> but also have practically identical TMRCAs, 3950+/-400 ybp, 3600+/-370 ybp,
> and 4125+/-400 ybp, respectively. All within the same margin of error. For
> U106 it is 4175+/-430 ybp.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Anatole Klyosov
>
>
>
>


This thread: