GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268411071


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:24:31 -0500
References: <376447.73467.qm@web25904.mail.ukl.yahoo.com><4B992A34.6060104@san.rr.com><FCA563F0-DD03-4B1E-A5ED-D1751792324B@vizachero.com><00e201cac145$82fec7c0$5e82af48@Ken1><59b150b1003111148g536d80e5he4ebb561c9048fc0@mail.gmail.com><017901cac159$4e6c7020$5e82af48@Ken1><086F1093A566477B815995B401BB889C@HP><3480483d1003111821h356097c0k9398df8feee1aaf5@mail.gmail.com><9B0B4A99411F485ABB2126B26DD996BE@HP><000f01cac1f6$c9ef4fe0$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <000f01cac1f6$c9ef4fe0$5e82af48@Ken1>


I totally agree that history tells us debates between us are pointless, though I
will probably disagree with you as to the reason. However, I have not stooped
to insults as you just have. Are you not aware that hurling insults is a sure
sign a debater has lost the debate?

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:15 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
>
> Aren't you tired of this periodic outbreak? This has been
> going on for years. All that has been achieved is "she
> defines, but he discovers!"
>
> I find your position something like classroom canon from
> yesteryear and basically intellectually claustrophobic.
> Some have moved on.
>
> Go to my very recent response to Sasson for the rest of what
> needed to be said.
>
> Ken
>


This thread: