GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268412050


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:40:50 -0700
References: <376447.73467.qm@web25904.mail.ukl.yahoo.com><4B992A34.6060104@san.rr.com><FCA563F0-DD03-4B1E-A5ED-D1751792324B@vizachero.com><00e201cac145$82fec7c0$5e82af48@Ken1><59b150b1003111148g536d80e5he4ebb561c9048fc0@mail.gmail.com><017901cac159$4e6c7020$5e82af48@Ken1><086F1093A566477B815995B401BB889C@HP><3480483d1003111821h356097c0k9398df8feee1aaf5@mail.gmail.com><9B0B4A99411F485ABB2126B26DD996BE@HP><000f01cac1f6$c9ef4fe0$5e82af48@Ken1><CEEF407306F947DC84A9CA71A1B4F943@HP>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>

>I totally agree that history tells us debates between us are pointless,
>though I
> will probably disagree with you as to the reason. However, I have not
> stooped
> to insults as you just have. Are you not aware that hurling insults is a
> sure
> sign a debater has lost the debate?


I have no interest in rehashing the years of exchanges with you. So I'll
just compare the last 30 minutes.

You state as fact that something I am doing is "inappropriate.... la de
da"

By contrast I "find" your approach intellectually claustrophobic ... la de
da. So it seems insults are mainly in the eyes of the beholder and are
highly subjective.



This thread: