Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268495766

From: "Sandy Paterson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] FW: Genome work ushers innew geneticera- howcan we mine new data?
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:56:06 -0000
References: <000001cac2ba$26997fe0$73cc7fa0$@com><006e01cac2bb$db3d9700$5e82af48@Ken1> <000001cac2c1$d4507600$7cf16200$@com><008301cac2c4$d0426070$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <008301cac2c4$d0426070$5e82af48@Ken1>


So a full genome will find much that WTY won't. That's what I was hoping

I should be able to find the message - I'll have a look and post out of


-----Original Message-----
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
Sent: 13 March 2010 15:50
Subject: Re: [DNA] FW: Genome work ushers in new geneticera- howcan we mine
new data?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Paterson" <>

> Some time ago, in the context of the Walk through the Y project, you
> expressed the view that the chances of finding an SNP mutation downstream
> of
> M222+ was about 4 in 10. Was that estimate a function of the process used
> in
> Walk through the Y, or would you make the same estimate for a full genome
> analysis?

[[ Sandy, That number seems high under the simple scenario that comes to
mind. M222+ is quite young. Do you have reference to my message if such
exists? I'd like to know more about the context. Problem is WtheY looks at

just 100,000 sites. If we use a 2 / 100 million average probability of snp
mutation we would expect a snp mutation found for every 500 generations of
branch length of exposure. 4/10 of that is 200 generations or 6000 years.

I believe the M222 snp is substantially younger than that.

There are certainly many, many snps to be found on any M222+ person's y
which are downstream of M222. Problem is that the WtheY only looks at
100,000 sites of the whole y.

Ken ]]

To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: