Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268507579

From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:12:59 -0700
References: <><><><00e201cac145$82fec7c0$5e82af48@Ken1><><017901cac159$4e6c7020$5e82af48@Ken1><086F1093A566477B815995B401BB889C@HP><><><000601cac1f5$b5338040$5e82af48@Ken1><294168F50E07487A812B78EBD02BCBF4@HP><><BCC91D9EA86E43FCBF0F1AEAFB5CD7A7@HP><011b01cac212$8b6e9340$5e82af48@Ken1><65609D4617B84F15B9653A789115A218@HP><013801cac216$a3a77450$5e82af48@Ken1><D7C366EF2B1D47A89D465B482BD0B343@HP><><0AAEE7A9F5B949C68C94CFFDA0716573@HP>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>>

He said "tags" (genetic mutations) do not make the clades, that demographic
> events make (define) the clades. I don't know how much clearer ........
> he
> could have been.

[[ You are now getting sleazy or sloppy with your quotes. All should know
you stuck the (define) in there. It's your mind that equates "make" with
"define" --- no one else around here that I know of. Not only did you
insert your "define" but you took out "collectively" from your quote without
even a ....... I think it is also of questionable taste to be addressing
your messages to one person while in them making misrepresentations of other
people. Ken ]]

This thread: