GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268588610
From: "Tim Janzen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Are the testing companies being guided to invest inthewrong things for Genealogy?
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:43:30 -0700
You might want to look at this message for a listing of markers in
order of their mutation rates:
83. There was also a thread on this topic beginning on March 31, 2009 and
subsequent days that you might want to review for additional background. To
see this thread simply go to
scroll to the bottom of the messages to see the start of the thread and go
to the top of the messages at
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/GENEALOGY-DNA/2009-04 to see
the end of the thread.
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Terry Barton
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:08 AM
Subject: [DNA] Are the testing companies being guided to invest in thewrong
things for Genealogy?
Does anyone have a systematic approach to which markers would be slow and
which fast? My inclination would be to include only these markers as "fast"
from the first 67: 464, 724 (CDY), 570 and 557. (If we used all of the
FTDNA "red markers", we'd also include 385, 439, 458, 449, 456, 576 and some
more from 38-67)
|Re: [DNA] Are the testing companies being guided to invest inthewrong things for Genealogy? by "Tim Janzen" <>|