GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268596486


From: "Nancy Custer" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Number of matches for WAMH in FTDNA database
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:54:46 -0700
References: <167bf.c1f2fcf.38ce97a5@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <167bf.c1f2fcf.38ce97a5@aol.com>


Thanks Bill, that's exactly what I was hoping for. I just wanted to
illustrate the differences one might expect in results. I just didn't have
anyone come to mind who was spot on even at 12 markers.

Nancy

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 12:49 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Number of matches for WAMH in FTDNA database

One of our Davenport lines is WAMH. On 12 markers they have 2060 exact
matches. They vary from the WAMH 25 by one, so they have 22 exact matches,
141
with a GD of one, and 548 with a GD of two. By 37 markers they are
different by three additional markers.

Bill Davenport
>


------------

In a message dated 3/14/2010 3:23:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
writes:

Does someone have a number for the number of exact WAMH matches at
12/25/37
markers in the FTDNA database? I'm giving a talk tomorrow and wanted to
mention it. Or just what is a really large number of matches. The Dorseys
all seem to have some odd marker that sets them aside so I can't pick the
number off of any of my pages. Fortuitous for us anyway:)

Thanks,

Nancy

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4944 (20100314) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4944 (20100314) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



This thread: