GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268615595


From: John S Walden <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Number of matches for WAMH in FTDNA database
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:13:15 -0400
References: <03a801cac3ab$a0eef800$e2cce800$@org><B27D61E723904037862A4DD2CEF03097@HP><9D479DCC0A57466FB0ACFA8857D0730A@HP><fef9eee41003141352ja1cdd96ga8d6d240c9039791@mail.gmail.com><2D72992A9C054777AE16A71694EE80CE@HP>
In-Reply-To: <2D72992A9C054777AE16A71694EE80CE@HP>


Diana
I did not make it clear but John C gave a good answer to my point
And it does make some sense to do it that way.

You Wrote

13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 2058 *This is the same as my Adams
(NO 1 step off)*

13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 1098 * This is one step off my Adams
( the one above)

* 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 1068 * This is one step off the 1st
one *

13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 - 983 * This is one step off the 1st
one Add those together an the number of men at GD 1 from the 1st one is over
3000*

John W


This thread: