GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268621887


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Number of matches for WAMH in FTDNA database
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:58:07 -0400
References: <03a801cac3ab$a0eef800$e2cce800$@org><B27D61E723904037862A4DD2CEF03097@HP><9D479DCC0A57466FB0ACFA8857D0730A@HP><fef9eee41003141352ja1cdd96ga8d6d240c9039791@mail.gmail.com><2D72992A9C054777AE16A71694EE80CE@HP><fef9eee41003141813i430cb0c4mac3249f9e0e4c4e3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fef9eee41003141813i430cb0c4mac3249f9e0e4c4e3@mail.gmail.com>


Yes, John gave you a good answer. The information I supplied re: the four WAMH
haplotypes was a message in response to Nancy, not to you, but if it helped you,
I'm glad that it did.

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of John S Walden
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:13 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Number of matches for WAMH in FTDNA database
>
> Diana
> I did not make it clear but John C gave a good answer to my point
> And it does make some sense to do it that way.
>
> You Wrote
>
> 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 2058 *This is the same
> as my Adams
> (NO 1 step off)*
>
> 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 1098 * This is one
> step off my Adams
> ( the one above)
>
> * 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - 1068 * This is one
> step off the 1st
> one *
>
> 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 - 983 * This is one step
> off the 1st
> one Add those together an the number of men at GD 1 from the
> 1st one is over
> 3000*
>
> John W
>


This thread: