GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268649905


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] The tree house definition (was: Clades, Definitions,Discoveries, FTDNA)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:45:05 -0400
References: <4B9DAF61.9040207@comcast.net><01ad01cac3f9$7fcf1030$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <01ad01cac3f9$7fcf1030$5e82af48@Ken1>


Ken,

They must be ice skating in hell because I totally agree with you.

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:39 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] The tree house definition (was: Clades,
> Definitions,Discoveries, FTDNA)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bonnie Schrack" <>
>
> > light that truly clarifies what's behind this interminable,
> > tedious bickering. . .
>
> [[ It may be tedious bickering to you; that's your privilege.
> But fundamental issues at the heart of activities in genetic
> population studies were being disagreed about by the
> participants.
>
> I would suggest more tolerance from you or other listers who
> don't care for particular debates they have no interest in or
> don't wish to engage in for one reason or the other. Probably
> all of us find prolonged exchanges on topics taking place on
> this rootsweb exchange which are of minimal interest to us
> or even mystify us that such things could be argued about.
> This site has a very diverse listers. Ken ]]
>


This thread: