GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268664269
From: Al Aburto <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:44:44 -0700
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>, ,<SNT115-W100A5F4E30C0231B9E890ACC2E0@phx.gbl>, ,<016301cac3e3$fe0b33e0$5e82af48@Ken1>,<SNT115-W196CFB24CCDD653D7C3D50CC2E0@phx.gbl>,<01ba01cac3fb$87b368d0$5e82af48@Ken1> <SNT115-W3785126A2D053855EFBF3ACC2E0@phx.gbl><484BD95E-5ADD-404B-ADAC-05EB2213EA59@vizachero.com>
and this _hypothetical_ SNP would be called L21.2 in J2 instead ...
that is, R- L21.1 in one case and J-L21.2 in the other ...
In reviewing WTY files, I already see these parallel mutations happening
more and more!
Recently in fact in one of our J2a-L24 clusters, Thomas found a person
derived for M365, formerly a J1 only SNP. So now we have M365.1 in J1
and M365.2 in J2. In J2a-L24 in fact we have found 10 new SNPs recently
via WTY! There are 3 new SNPs in my own Y-chromosome. What on Earth!
I have no idea how recently these SNPs have occurred. Much work to do
to find out!
We're going to have Y-SNPs up the kazoo!
> On 3/15/2010 7:05 AM, Vincent Vizachero wrote:
> However, this is not cause for concern because - as Diana pointed out
> - phylogeneticists always use the SNPs in the context of other SNPs.
> If someone in J2 turns up L21+, that won't confuse us because it will
> be obvious from all his other SNPs (M429,M304,M172, etc.) that he is
> actually J2.
|Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA by Al Aburto <>|