Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268691582

From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:19:42 -0400
References: <><><><1072FC26160F4735BC62506A750D877D@HP><><002001cac47e$02c94a30$5e82af48@Ken1><FFB22BF095AB49C2B13C1074856ED837@HP><>
In-Reply-To: <>


It is a given that the history of the evolution of life exists complete and
unchanging in the past, regardless of how much of it I or anyone else happens to
know about it. Good grief, I'm a (retired) paleontologist. Who here
appreciates it more than I do?

And as I've responded similarly in this message
and this one
and this one
one does begin to wonder why you keep bringing it up.

When I speak of the Y-DNA tree/haplotree/haplogroup tree/cladogram changing, I
*OBVIOUSLY* mean the structure on this page:

Please study the meaning of equivocation:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Vincent Vizachero
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:30 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Clades, Definitions, Discoveries, FTDNA
> What is expanding is your knowledge of the tree.
> It is the ultimate logical fallacy to believe that things
> don't exist unless you know about them.
> VV
> On Mar 15, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Diana Gale Matthiesen wrote:
> > The tree/haplotree/haplogroup tree/cladogram does expand. If it
> > didn't, I wouldn't have to keep revising my web pages.

This thread: