GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268694499


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Y-DNA clade naming
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:08:19 -0400
References: <4B9DA2EB.7080508@comcast.net><BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPEEOAHAAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org><3b2a446a1003150700m4fcb5408r54a94065ac2dafac@mail.gmail.com><1072FC26160F4735BC62506A750D877D@HP><3b2a446a1003151310t6b557bb1p56a0a60c9954ff4f@mail.gmail.com><70982D78CDAD4EB2A62F999DBA19A068@HP><008001cac490$95a4f130$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <008001cac490$95a4f130$5e82af48@Ken1>


I'd say you're the one who missed the point. Then again, I see you do
acknowledge the tree changes. I've won!

Diana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:41 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Y-DNA clade naming
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
>
> > So, looking up M359.... I can only find an M359.2, which is
> > a synonym for P41.2 which is the defining SNP for I2a2a.
> > M359.2 may be the more useful name, to you, but I2a2a
> > is the more useful name, to me.
>
>
> But P41.2+ is no longer I2a2a; it's I2a2a1 because snps were
> found to split I2a2 into its Dinaric and Isles clade branches.
> Or others might put it: "old I2a2a" has changed to I2a2a1.
>
> Maybe that was sort of Sasson's point; but I'll let him
> stress that if so.
>
>
>


This thread: