GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268695475


From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Y-DNA clade naming
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:24:35 -0400
References: <4B9DA2EB.7080508@comcast.net><BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPEEOAHAAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org><3b2a446a1003150700m4fcb5408r54a94065ac2dafac@mail.gmail.com><1072FC26160F4735BC62506A750D877D@HP><3b2a446a1003151310t6b557bb1p56a0a60c9954ff4f@mail.gmail.com><70982D78CDAD4EB2A62F999DBA19A068@HP><008001cac490$95a4f130$5e82af48@Ken1><67DF01AC08374C3F94F7091CD147DB78@HP><00b501cac494$e2a77670$5e82af48@Ken1><00bc01cac495$7e984500$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01cac495$7e984500$5e82af48@Ken1>


My aren't we self-congratulatory? [That's another rhetorical question.]

Diana

P.S. What's a "tag"?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:16 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Y-DNA clade naming
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
> >
> > Then again, I see you do
> >> acknowledge the [[haplogroup KN]] tree changes. [[[ Take a deep
> >> breath ]]]
>
> [[What makes this so hilarious, and illustrative, is that
> when L69.n and
> L161 came along to be tags for I2a2-Dinaric and I2a2-Isles, I
> did not have
> to touch my warpedfounderstree for haplogroup I. The split
> tree structure
> between those two clades had long previously been discovered
> using STR
> haplotypes and so drawn. All I had to do is write the snp
> tags on the two
> branches of my powerpoint slide. KN]]
>


This thread: