GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268770858


From: MaryJo Neyer <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] U106 and P312?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:20:58 -0400
References: <59b617a01003161305rb85b616r57981d3f6bf36b6d@mail.gmail.com><01c101cac544$f213c3b0$5e82af48@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <01c101cac544$f213c3b0$5e82af48@Ken1>


Thank you to both of you for your responses to my question.
Mary Jo

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Ken Nordtvedt <>wrote:

> At best it would have some statistical tendency to be valid, but certainly
> not with the strength many desire.
>
> In other words, if we could survey Europe 500 BC before the Romans started
> to shake up things to their north, it might be that U106 would show up at
> higher frequency among the tribes speaking Germanic, while P312 might show
> up at higher frequency among the tribes speaking Celtic.
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MaryJo Neyer" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:05 PM
> Subject: [DNA] U106 and P312?
>
>
> > Hi. I read a post the other day that stated that to test positive for
> > U106
> > was indicative of German ancestry and that P312 was evidence of Celtic
> > ancestry. Is this a generally accepted theory right now or is just one
> > person's opinion?
> > Thanks, Mary Jo
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> > with the word 'unsubscribe' without
> the
> > quotes in the subject and the body of the message
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: