GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268778976


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] S28 SNP - The ''Latin'' R1b
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:36:16 -0400
References: <6b9219061003152354w325cc88o27b320f916a89043@mail.gmail.com><797E5C7F-68F5-47A7-99D9-F3847F3A44B6@vizachero.com><6b9219061003161243o58dabf83k6776113415925807@mail.gmail.com><32BF0068-833E-4D0C-A40B-D7F812674BD9@vizachero.com><6b9219061003161340w1c820404xf01868b129f98780@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6b9219061003161340w1c820404xf01868b129f98780@mail.gmail.com>


If your argument is that Italians are the exclusive or primary source
for the 15% of Wales that is (according to you) R-U152, while R-U152
is only 20% in Italians, then you are indeed arguing for a fairly
massive population replacement.

And if you then argue that the Roman haplogroup distribution was
nothing like the Italian distribution, well then you're just making
the whole theory up out of nothing.

VV


On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:40 PM, peter spencer wrote:

> I dont think Im arguing for anything like that overall pct of roman-
> era
> introgression into the modern welsh Y-makeup.


This thread: