Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268791724

From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] conversion factors
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:08:44 -0400
References: <7F690F357D474436813965A3C30E1DB3@HP><>
In-Reply-To: <>

Yes, the Ancestry results I was looking at are from 2008, so they have the old,
high value.

I think it's important when you do conversions to always add a footnote
indicating which markers you changed, what they were originally, and what you
did to them -- including adding that information to the Notes of any upload to


> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Charles Hollenbeck
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:34 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] conversion factors
> Diana,
> used to add 11 to the H4 values of FTDNA
> customers who joined their surname/etc. groups. The aim
> was to bring them into alignment with the standards that
> Ancestry used. The results you mention must
> be from before Ancestry adjusted their counting/reporting
> method. As I recall, for FTDNA testees there were 4 STR's
> (including H4) that were adjusted by Ancestry.
> Charlie

This thread: