GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268800528


From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Ancestry.com to FTDNA Thanks!
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:35:28 -0500
References: <39570.72596.qm@web53408.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <39570.72596.qm@web53408.mail.re2.yahoo.com>


I counted only 67 that had tested at Ancestry, so it looks as if you got a
good portion of them. I think it would OK to compare the haplotypes of the
others privately on a spreadsheet to see if anything of interest shows up.
You also might be able to find them on various genealogy sites.

Bob

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Nancy Kiser <> wrote:

> We are having a difficult time recruiting Philllips in the ancestry
> database. There are over 170 people with the surname Phillips in the
> ancestry database but only 28 have joined the project that we set up at
> ancestry. We have sent invites to every single person. Any suggestions?
>
> Nancy Kiser
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Robert Stafford <>
> wrote:
>
> I think your are doing your project members a disservice by not recruiting
> Ancestry testers. There are 40 Baileys and variants tested at Ancestry
> compared to 138 (per FTDNA) in your project.
>
> Bob Stafford
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: