GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1268997755
From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Map of Indian haplogroups in Indonesia
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:22:35 -0400
On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:01 PM, argiedude wrote:
> Together with these 2 samples there were 2 samples of R1b1*.
There were NO samples identified as R1b1*. The samples are
R1b1(xM269). I'm just trying to ensure that the list is not misled by
> And you're not considering the main point of my post.
No, I just don't care about the "main point" of your post. What I
care about is that you are telling people that R1b1* is found
someplace where it wasn't. These samples (if they are even
legitimate, which I honestly won't be sure of until I've seen the
haplotypes or a second confirming study), could just as well be
R1b1b1. And THAT, given the attested contact between Bali and China
(among other places) would not be the least bit incredible.
|Re: [DNA] Map of Indian haplogroups in Indonesia by Vincent Vizachero <>|