Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-03 > 1269534951

From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] The family tree of a gene as oppsoed to the family treeof a species or clade (or race)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:38:19 -0400
References: <A2B27073CD08414EBA85170780CF2B63@PC>
In-Reply-To: <A2B27073CD08414EBA85170780CF2B63@PC>

Indeed, I think this distinction is both important and easy to overlook.

We have become comfortable thinking of PEOPLE having (or belonging to)
haplogroups, when in truth they don't. It is the y-chromosome itself
or the mtDNA itself that have haplogroups. Not the person.

Of course the semantic distinction is less important than that people
know WHY there is a distinction.


On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Lancaster-Boon wrote:

> I thought that, as quite often, John Hawks makes a point which many
> people
> get wrong, very well:-
> se-2010.html
> ...and by the way this is in the context of the hot news about the new
> species claims coming from the pinky in the Altai. He has lots of
> interesting remarks on this subject.
> Regards
> Andrew
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and
> the body of the message

This thread: