GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-09 > 1284043509
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 2 routes for P312 and U106 ?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:45:09 -0600
References: <N1-eZsWo6u__D@Safe-mail.net> <84303C27-22C7-4056-935C-14D1348BA825@vizachero.com><000c01cb5029$709fc070$48692dae@Ken1><02d801cb502c$1d617360$58245a20$@org>
Your suggestions sound reasonable if we end up with data points determining
the contour map having comparable number of haplotypes underlying each
(consolidated) regional variance. I'll have to go back to the data table to
see those N numbers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Mayka" <>
There are two unbiased ways to deal with small samples:
> 1) Throw out _all_ samples that are too small. >
> 2) Consolidate small samples into larger regional ones,with
>> Estonia data point excluded.
|Re: [DNA] 2 routes for P312 and U106 ? by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>|