GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-09 > 1284043668


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 2 routes for P312 and U106 ?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:47:48 -0400
References: <N1-eZsWo6u__D@Safe-mail.net> <84303C27-22C7-4056-935C-14D1348BA825@vizachero.com><000c01cb5029$709fc070$48692dae@Ken1><02d801cb502c$1d617360$58245a20$@org>
In-Reply-To: <02d801cb502c$1d617360$58245a20$@org>


That's exactly what I was going to point out.

Even if you thought the Estonia datapoint was an anomaly (I have no
opinion about that), the broad picture remains the same: R-L23*, R-
U106, and R-P312 have very different variance distributions and all
three distributions are probably surprising to at least some people.

VV


On Sep 9, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Lawrence Mayka wrote:

> The map will then show U106 emanating from Poland, which easily had
> the
> highest variance after Estonia.

This thread: