GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-09 > 1284047843
From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 2 routes for P312 and U106 ?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:57:23 -0400
References: <N1-eZsWo6u__D@Safe-mail.net> <84303C27-22C7-4056-935C-14D1348BA825@vizachero.com><000c01cb5029$709fc070$48692dae@Ken1><02d801cb502c$1d617360$58245a20$@org><001701cb502d$9bd5edb0$48692dae@Ken1><D56DBAC5-6F39-441E-9F88-F99EDFB2BDEA@vizachero.com><000c01cb5031$704b8c50$48692dae@Ken1><336EC08D-5FD7-4CEA-8EEC-07F3A6199172@vizachero.com><005201cb5035$440e2ea0$48692dae@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <005201cb5035$440e2ea0$48692dae@Ken1>
They only included in Table S2 populations where n was >5, and maybe
also limited to samples where the total R1b percentage was >5%.
VV
On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
> When comparing their dataspread of actual U106 haplotypes with the
> table
> giving country summary counts and variances, the data from countries
> such as
> Hungary, Slovenia, Sweden.... are missing from the summary counts,
> Td,
> variances table. Why?
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and
> the body of the message
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] 2 routes for P312 and U106 ? by Vincent Vizachero <> |