GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1290455712


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Age of Zhong et al. (2010) R1b-related lineages
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:55:12 -0800 (PST)
References: <mailman.231.1290412843.9798.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com><AEB015F691104C5680283852F65B42B4@anatoldesktop><EE1CBB78-BCF0-4E85-8724-9A0848C67ADA@vizachero.com><001301cb8a6f$053a4960$c2482dae@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <001301cb8a6f$053a4960$c2482dae@Ken1>


Perhaps not. The important takeaway message is, I think, that you cannot
infinitely reduce the confidence interval by simply adding more and more
samples. If people get that, I'll be happy.

VV


----- Original Message ----
From: Ken Nordtvedt <>
To:
Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 12:59:30 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Age of Zhong et al. (2010) R1b-related lineages

And I don't think it is productive to introduce another "effective
something" --- such as "effective n".


This thread: